Mobile Phone Company Reviews >> Previous page >> Review

Write a Mobile Phone Review Write a Mobile Phone Review


Review of Motorola Razr V3 Mobile Phone


Review by John Marsham
Rating: 0.00 (0 votes)
Review Added: 21/10/2007 - Updated: -

Review Categories:
Handsets

Customer Review Comments:

I got my Motorola razr v3 from Tesco on their value pay as you go tariff for £60. It looked great value but after using I realise that the manufacturers only put the minimum memory capacity in these phones. My wife has found the same problem with a new Nokia 6310 on orange pay as you go.

My phone looks great and i like the interface but it only takes about ten texts to fill up the memory which is next to useless.

Good Points: Looks good and easy to use
Bad Points: Not enough memory
Customer Service Rating: 4/5
Value for Money Rating: 3/5
Overall Rating: 3/5
Recommended? No
Company Website:


Comments for this Review:  Add Your Comment

Recommend this Review:

Rate this Review:
Please rate this review between 1 and 5
with 5 being top.		 All ratings received for this review.

ALL CATEGORIES

POPULAR CATEGORIES

DIRECTORY CATEGORIES

CUSTOMER REVIEWS

ARTICLES & TIPS

CONTACT US

Email:

Name:

Your code:
security code

Enter the code above:
LATEST LISTINGS

LATEST REVIEWS

LATEST ARTICLES

MOBILE PHONE AWARDS

The What Mobile Awards feature companies and providers voted best by real customers with over 3000 people voting for their favourite in 2007. Some of the winners of 2007 are...

BEST ONLINE RETAILER
The Carphone Warehouse

BEST HIGH STREET RETAILER
The Carphone Warehouse

BEST MANUFACTURER
Sony Ericsson

BEST NETWORK
T-Mobile

BEST PHONE
Nokia 6300

More Awards>

Directory Home | Users Login | Privacy | Submit Site

Copyright © 2010 UK Mobile Pages - Mobile Phone Company Directory.
All directory listings, articles and reviews are provided for information only and do not constitute advice or a recommendation of any product or provider. If you use these insurers, we take no responsibility and give no guarantees, warranties or representations, implied or otherwise, for the content or accuracy of these third-party web sites or companies.